Klees v. Klees

609 So. 2d 830, 1992 La. LEXIS 3953, 1992 WL 390094
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedDecember 22, 1992
DocketNo. 92-CC-2961
StatusPublished

This text of 609 So. 2d 830 (Klees v. Klees) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Klees v. Klees, 609 So. 2d 830, 1992 La. LEXIS 3953, 1992 WL 390094 (La. 1992).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

The parties' consent judgment provides that “John F. Klees, shall pay Gladys P. Klees Louisiana Civil Code Article 1601 permanent, periodic alimony, which is contractual ... for a period of thirty six (36) months.... The parties agree and IT IS ORDERED that there shall be no increases or decreases [in the monthly payments of] permanent, periodic alimony under any at all circumstances.” The court of appeal erred in concluding that under the consent judgment Mr. Klees’ contractual obligation for alimony was governed by the conditions of La.Civ.Code art. 160, including termination upon remarriage. The consent judgment is clear. Mr. Klees is contractually obligated to pay permanent, periodic alimony for thirty-six months without qualification. The consent judgment’s reference to article 160 was merely intended to describe the type of alimony Mr. Klees had agreed to pay, i.e., permanent, periodic alimony as opposed to alimony pendente lite. This reference was not intended to qualify his contractual obligation. The court of appeal erred in holding otherwise. Accordingly, the judgment of the court of appeal is vacated and set aside and the judgment of the trial court dismissing Mr. Klees’ motion to terminate alimony is reinstated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 160
Louisiana § 160

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
609 So. 2d 830, 1992 La. LEXIS 3953, 1992 WL 390094, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/klees-v-klees-la-1992.