Kleeman v. J. & P. Baltz Brewing Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Kleeman v. J. & P. Baltz Brewing Co.

60 A. 408, 70 N.J.L. 202, 41 Vroom 202, 1903 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 59

DecidedNovember 9, 1903

StatusPublished

This text of 60 A. 408 (Kleeman v. J. & P. Baltz Brewing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kleeman v. J. & P. Baltz Brewing Co., 60 A. 408, 70 N.J.L. 202, 41 Vroom 202, 1903 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 59 (N.J. 1903).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is an application to set aside a judgment by confession because the affidavit does not, as required by the statute, state the true consideration of the bond. It sets forth that the true consideration of the bond was money loaned and advanced by plaintiffs to defendant.

The evidence shows that a considerable portion of the debt was for beer sold by plaintiffs to defendant. The judgment is therefore set aside. Reading v. Reading, 4 Zab. 358; Clapp v. Ely, 3 Dutcher 555.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This is an application to set aside a judgment by confession because the affidavit does not, as required by the statute, state the true consideration of the bond. It sets forth that the true consideration of the bond was money loaned and advanced by plaintiffs to defendant.

The evidence shows that a considerable portion of the debt was for beer sold by plaintiffs to defendant. The judgment is therefore set aside. Reading v. Reading, 4 Zab. 358; Clapp v. Ely, 3 Dutcher 555.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

60 A. 408, 70 N.J.L. 202, 41 Vroom 202, 1903 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 59, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kleeman-v-j-p-baltz-brewing-co-nj-1903.