Kleeman, M. v. Schrantz, E. and DOT
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
MARK PAUL: KLEEMAN, IN ESSE AND : No. 155 MM 2018 SUI JURIS, CLAIMANT IN LAW, :
:
Petitioner :
: :
v. :
: :
ERIC M. SCHRANTZ, IN HIS OFFICIAL : AND PRIVATE CAPACITY AND THE : COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : T/D/B/A DEPARTMENT OF : TRANSPORTATION, BUREAU OF : DRIVER'S LICENSING, :
:
Respondents :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 26th day of November, 2018, the Application for Leave to File
Original Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for “Writ of Mandamus in the Nature of
Equity” is DENIED.
The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to strike the name of the jurist from the caption.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kleeman, M. v. Schrantz, E. and DOT (Kleeman, M. v. Schrantz, E. and DOT) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.