Kleeman, M. v. Schrantz, E. and DOT

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided November 26, 2018·No. 155 MM 2018·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT

MARK PAUL: KLEEMAN, IN ESSE AND : No. 155 MM 2018 SUI JURIS, CLAIMANT IN LAW, :

:

Petitioner :

: :

v. :

: :

ERIC M. SCHRANTZ, IN HIS OFFICIAL : AND PRIVATE CAPACITY AND THE : COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : T/D/B/A DEPARTMENT OF : TRANSPORTATION, BUREAU OF : DRIVER'S LICENSING, :

:

Respondents :

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 26th day of November, 2018, the Application for Leave to File

Original Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for “Writ of Mandamus in the Nature of

Equity” is DENIED.

The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to strike the name of the jurist from the caption.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kleeman, M. v. Schrantz, E. and DOT, (Pa. 2018).

Kleeman, M. v. Schrantz, E. and DOT (Kleeman, M. v. Schrantz, E. and DOT) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.