Kleeman, M. v. Schrantz, E. and DOT
This text of Kleeman, M. v. Schrantz, E. and DOT (Kleeman, M. v. Schrantz, E. and DOT) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
MARK PAUL: KLEEMAN, IN ESSE AND : No. 155 MM 2018 SUI JURIS, CLAIMANT IN LAW, : : Petitioner : : : v. : : : ERIC M. SCHRANTZ, IN HIS OFFICIAL : AND PRIVATE CAPACITY AND THE : COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : T/D/B/A DEPARTMENT OF : TRANSPORTATION, BUREAU OF : DRIVER'S LICENSING, : : Respondents :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 26th day of November, 2018, the Application for Leave to File
Original Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for “Writ of Mandamus in the Nature of
Equity” is DENIED.
The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to strike the name of the jurist from the caption.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Kleeman, M. v. Schrantz, E. and DOT, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kleeman-m-v-schrantz-e-and-dot-pa-2018.