Kleckley v. State
This text of 810 So. 2d 1081 (Kleckley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Robert KLECKLEY, Petitioner,
v.
STATE of Florida, Respondent.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Robert Kleckley, Miami, pro se.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Monique E. L'Italien, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
This case involves Robert Kleckley's petition for writ of habeas corpus alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel for failing to order or have transcribed the sentencing transcripts. Kleckley alleges that when the trial court pronounced his sentence, it failed to orally pronounce his sentence under 10-20 Life, and as a habitual offender. We find Kleckley's petition legally sufficient, and grant relief. Compare Thompson v. State, 759 So.2d 650 (Fla.2000).
On remand, the trial court may appoint appellate counsel to assist Kleckley with preparing the record on appeal and his initial brief. The appeal is to address sentencing only.
POLEN, C.J., GROSS and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
810 So. 2d 1081, 2002 WL 429275, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kleckley-v-state-fladistctapp-2002.