Klebold v. Klebold
This text of 77 S.E.2d 440 (Klebold v. Klebold) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. “In a contest between the father and mother over the custody of a minor child in a habeas corpus proceeding the welfare of the child is of paramount consideration, and an award made by the judge based upon the evidence and in the exercise of a sound discretion will not be set aside.” Attaway v. Attaway, 194 Ga. 448 (22 S. E. 2d 50); Pruitt v. Butterfield, 189 Ga. 593 (6 S. E. 2d 786); Willingham v. Willingham, 192 Ga. 405 (15 S. E. 2d 514).
2. Under the evidence in this case, both parents had been delinquent in performing their legal and moral obligations to their minor child. The judgment of the trial judge, finding that it is to the best interest of the child to remain with her mother, was not without evidence to support it.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
77 S.E.2d 440, 210 Ga. 23, 1953 Ga. LEXIS 460, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/klebold-v-klebold-ga-1953.