Klebetz v. Town of Ramapo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Klebetz v. Town of Ramapo

96 A.D.2d 898, 465 N.Y.S.2d 845, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19504

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedAugust 22, 1983

StatusPublished

This text of 96 A.D.2d 898 (Klebetz v. Town of Ramapo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Klebetz v. Town of Ramapo, 96 A.D.2d 898, 465 N.Y.S.2d 845, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19504 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

— In an action to declare Local Law No. 3 of 1981 of the Town of Ramapo to be invalid, the intervenordefendant appeals from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Cerrato, J.), entered December 22, 1982, which granted plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment and declared that Local Law No. 3 of 1981 of the Town of Ramapo was invalid. Order and judgment affirmed, with costs to plaintiffs payable by the intervenor-defendant. Special Term properly declared the local law invalid based upon the town’s failure to comply with the procedural requirements set forth in section 376-190 of the town’s zoning law. Mollen, P. J., Titone, Weinstein and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In an action to declare Local Law No. 3 of 1981 of the Town of Ramapo to be invalid, the intervenordefendant appeals from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Cerrato, J.), entered December 22, 1982, which granted plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment and declared that Local Law No. 3 of 1981 of the Town of Ramapo was invalid. Order and judgment affirmed, with costs to plaintiffs payable by the intervenor-defendant. Special Term properly declared the local law invalid based upon the town’s failure to comply with the procedural requirements set forth in section 376-190 of the town’s zoning law. Mollen, P. J., Titone, Weinstein and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

96 A.D.2d 898, 465 N.Y.S.2d 845, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19504, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/klebetz-v-town-of-ramapo-nyappdiv-1983.