K.L.C. v. State

568 So. 2d 123, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 8015, 1990 WL 155510
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 18, 1990
DocketNo. 89-2269
StatusPublished

This text of 568 So. 2d 123 (K.L.C. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
K.L.C. v. State, 568 So. 2d 123, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 8015, 1990 WL 155510 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

COBB, Judge.

The appeal in this case, which was Case No. JU89-3738 at the trial level, challenges the defendant’s conviction because of a violation of the confrontation right under the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments. See Maryland v. Craig, — U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 3157, 111 L.Ed.2d 666 (1990) and Coy v. Iowa, 487 U.S. 1012, 108 S.Ct. 2798, 101 L.Ed.2d 857 (1988). The facts herein are basically indistinguishable from those in D.A.D. v. State, 566 So.2d 257 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990); therefore, we reverse the judgment and sentence and remand for new trial.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

COWART and HARRIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Coy v. Iowa
487 U.S. 1012 (Supreme Court, 1988)
Maryland v. Craig
497 U.S. 836 (Supreme Court, 1990)
D.A.D. v. State
566 So. 2d 257 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
568 So. 2d 123, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 8015, 1990 WL 155510, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/klc-v-state-fladistctapp-1990.