Klayman v. Obama
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
KLAYMAN et al., ) Plaintiffs, ; v i Civil Action No. 13-0851 (RJL) OBAMA et al., 3 F I L E D Defendants. ) NOV 0 9 2015 ORDERfIA Clark, U.S. District & Bankruptcy
Courts for the District of Columbia (November 3 ,2015)
For the reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion entered this date, it is hereby ORDERED that plaintiffs’ Renewed Motion for Preliminary Injunction [Dkt.
#149] is GRANTED as to plaintiffs J .J . Little and J .J . Little & Associates, PC. and DENIED as to plaintiffs Larry Klayman, Charles Strange, and Mary Ann Strange; it is further
ORDERED that the Government:
(1) is barred from collecting, as part of the NSA’S Bulk Telephony Metadata Program, any telephony metadata associated with J .J. Little and J .J . Little & Associates, PC. Verizon Business Network Services
telephone subscriptions; and
(2) must segregate out all such metadata already collected from any future
searches of its metadata database.
SO ORDERED.
/
RICHA ON United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Klayman v. Obama (Klayman v. Obama) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.