Klayman v. Obama

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Klayman v. Obama. Read the opinion of the Court — 957 F. Supp. 2d 1
District Court, District of Columbia·Decided November 9, 2015·No. Civil Action No. 2013-0851·Published

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

KLAYMAN et al., ) Plaintiffs, ; v i Civil Action No. 13-0851 (RJL) OBAMA et al., 3 F I L E D Defendants. ) NOV 0 9 2015 ORDERfIA Clark, U.S. District & Bankruptcy

Courts for the District of Columbia (November 3 ,2015)

For the reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion entered this date, it is hereby ORDERED that plaintiffs’ Renewed Motion for Preliminary Injunction [Dkt.

#149] is GRANTED as to plaintiffs J .J . Little and J .J . Little & Associates, PC. and DENIED as to plaintiffs Larry Klayman, Charles Strange, and Mary Ann Strange; it is further

ORDERED that the Government:

(1) is barred from collecting, as part of the NSA’S Bulk Telephony Metadata Program, any telephony metadata associated with J .J. Little and J .J . Little & Associates, PC. Verizon Business Network Services

telephone subscriptions; and

(2) must segregate out all such metadata already collected from any future

searches of its metadata database.

SO ORDERED.

/

RICHA ON United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Klayman v. Obama, (D.D.C. 2015).

Klayman v. Obama (Klayman v. Obama) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.