Klayman v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Klayman v. City of New York

142 A.D.2d 668, 533 N.Y.S.2d 443, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7922

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 18, 1988

StatusPublished

This text of 142 A.D.2d 668 (Klayman v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Klayman v. City of New York, 142 A.D.2d 668, 533 N.Y.S.2d 443, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7922 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

— Motion by Michael Savarese and cross motion by Jose Rivas for resettlement of a decision and order of this court, dated May 11, 1987 [130 AD2d 551], as amended November 16, 1987 [134 AD2d 408], which determined appeals and cross appeals from stated portions of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Leviss, J.), entered June 17, 1985.

Ordered that the motion is granted, to the extent of adding to the fourth line of the second decretal paragraph of the decision and order of this court dated May 11, 1987, after the words "all issues”, the words "including but not limited to the damages incurred by William Carroll and Barbara Carroll,”; and it is further,

Ordered that the motion is otherwise denied; and it is further,

Ordered that the cross motion is denied. Thompson, J. P., Bracken, Rubin and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Motion by Michael Savarese and cross motion by Jose Rivas for resettlement of a decision and order of this court, dated May 11, 1987 [130 AD2d 551], as amended November 16, 1987 [134 AD2d 408], which determined appeals and cross appeals from stated portions of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Leviss, J.), entered June 17, 1985.

Ordered that the motion is granted, to the extent of adding to the fourth line of the second decretal paragraph of the decision and order of this court dated May 11, 1987, after the words "all issues”, the words "including but not limited to the damages incurred by William Carroll and Barbara Carroll,”; and it is further,

Ordered that the motion is otherwise denied; and it is further,

Ordered that the cross motion is denied. Thompson, J. P., Bracken, Rubin and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

142 A.D.2d 668, 533 N.Y.S.2d 443, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7922, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/klayman-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1988.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack