Klay v. Cook

Eleventh Circuit

Klay v. Cook

295 F. App'x 956

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

DecidedOctober 7, 2008

DocketNo. 05-17170

StatusPublished

This text of 295 F. App'x 956 (Klay v. Cook) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Klay v. Cook, 295 F. App'x 956 (11th Cir. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

After oral argument and careful consideration, we readily conclude that the judgment of the district court is due to be affirmed. For the reasons discussed at oral argument, we conclude that the notice of the class action settlement amply satisfied the requirements of due process. We also conclude that Dr. Cook failed to preserve in the district court his argument that some of his claims were not “finally adjudicated” and thus should have been excluded from the claims released by the settlement agreement.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

After oral argument and careful consideration, we readily conclude that the judgment of the district court is due to be affirmed. For the reasons discussed at oral argument, we conclude that the notice of the class action settlement amply satisfied the requirements of due process. We also conclude that Dr. Cook failed to preserve in the district court his argument that some of his claims were not “finally adjudicated” and thus should have been excluded from the claims released by the settlement agreement.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

295 F. App'x 956, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/klay-v-cook-ca11-2008.