Klay v. Cook

Eleventh Circuit

Klay v. Cook

295 F. App'x 956

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided October 7, 2008·No. No. 05-17170·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

After oral argument and careful consideration, we readily conclude that the judgment of the district court is due to be affirmed. For the reasons discussed at oral argument, we conclude that the notice of the class action settlement amply satisfied the requirements of due process. We also conclude that Dr. Cook failed to preserve in the district court his argument that some of his claims were not “finally adjudicated” and thus should have been excluded from the claims released by the settlement agreement.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

After oral argument and careful consideration, we readily conclude that the judgment of the district court is due to be affirmed. For the reasons discussed at oral argument, we conclude that the notice of the class action settlement amply satisfied the requirements of due process. We also conclude that Dr. Cook failed to preserve in the district court his argument that some of his claims were not “finally adjudicated” and thus should have been excluded from the claims released by the settlement agreement.

AFFIRMED.

Klay v. Cook, 295 F. App'x 956 (11th Cir. 2008).

Pincite

295 F. App'x 956 (Klay v. Cook) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.