Klawson v. Mayo

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Klawson v. Mayo

147 A. 460, 7 N.J. Misc. 887, 1929 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 121

DecidedOctober 16, 1929

StatusPublished

This text of 147 A. 460 (Klawson v. Mayo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Klawson v. Mayo, 147 A. 460, 7 N.J. Misc. 887, 1929 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 121 (N.J. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The plaintiffs recovered judgments against the defendant.

Our examination of the testimony in this case leads us to the conclusion that there were disputed questions of fact [888]*888which were properly submitted to the jury by the trial judge, and that hence there was no error in refusing to nonsuit the plaintiffs nor in refusing to direct a verdict for the defendant. Rush v. Commercial Realty Co., 7 N. J. Mis. R. 337.

The judgment will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The plaintiffs recovered judgments against the defendant.

Our examination of the testimony in this case leads us to the conclusion that there were disputed questions of fact [888]*888which were properly submitted to the jury by the trial judge, and that hence there was no error in refusing to nonsuit the plaintiffs nor in refusing to direct a verdict for the defendant. Rush v. Commercial Realty Co., 7 N. J. Mis. R. 337.

The judgment will be affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

147 A. 460, 7 N.J. Misc. 887, 1929 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 121, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/klawson-v-mayo-nj-1929.