Klaver v. Viajes y Yates LLC

D. New Mexico

Klaver v. Viajes y Yates LLC

DecidedJanuary 23, 2024

Docket1:23-cv-00815

StatusUnknown

This text of Klaver v. Viajes y Yates LLC (Klaver v. Viajes y Yates LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. New Mexico primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Klaver v. Viajes y Yates LLC, (D.N.M. 2024).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO CHERYL KLAVER, Plaintiff, Vv. No. 1:23-cv-815 JHR/KRS VIAJES Y YATES, LLC. Defendant. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE THIS MATTER comes before the Court sua sponte. Plaintiff initiated this action on September 21, 2023. (Doc. 1). On October 17, 2023, Plaintiff filed an Affidavit of Service stating that Defendant was served on September 26, 2023. (Doc. 2). No answer or other responsive pleading has been filed by Defendant. Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure authorizes the Court to dismiss an action sua sponte for failure to prosecute. See Olsen v. Mapes, 333 F.3d 1199, 1204 n.3 (10th Cir. 2003); see also D.N.M. LR-Civ. 41.1 (“A civil action may be dismissed if, for a period of ninety (90) calendar days, no steps are taken to move the case forward.”). More than ninety days have passed since Plaintiff took any step to move this case forward. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that on or before January 31, 2024, Plaintiff must provide the Court with a written explanation showing good cause why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute.

ui Susosee “Ei SWEAZEA UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO CHERYL KLAVER, Plaintiff, Vv. No. 1:23-cv-815 JHR/KRS VIAJES Y YATES, LLC. Defendant. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE THIS MATTER comes before the Court sua sponte. Plaintiff initiated this action on September 21, 2023. (Doc. 1). On October 17, 2023, Plaintiff filed an Affidavit of Service stating that Defendant was served on September 26, 2023. (Doc. 2). No answer or other responsive pleading has been filed by Defendant. Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure authorizes the Court to dismiss an action sua sponte for failure to prosecute. See Olsen v. Mapes, 333 F.3d 1199, 1204 n.3 (10th Cir. 2003); see also D.N.M. LR-Civ. 41.1 (“A civil action may be dismissed if, for a period of ninety (90) calendar days, no steps are taken to move the case forward.”). More than ninety days have passed since Plaintiff took any step to move this case forward. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that on or before January 31, 2024, Plaintiff must provide the Court with a written explanation showing good cause why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute.

ui Susosee “Ei SWEAZEA UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Klaver v. Viajes y Yates LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/klaver-v-viajes-y-yates-llc-nmd-2024.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack