Klausz v. Dillon Companies

779 P.2d 863, 13 Brief Times Rptr. 1105, 1989 Colo. LEXIS 267, 1989 WL 106403
Supreme Court of Colorado·Decided September 18, 1989·No. No. 88SA443·Published

Opinion

Justice ERICKSON

delivered the Opinion of the Court.

Appellant Romuald Klausz appeals from the trial court’s order granting appellee Dillon Company, Inc.’s motion for summary judgment. Specifically, appellant argues that the trial court erred in finding section 13 — 21—115(3)(c), 6A C.R.S. (1987) (actions against landowners), constitutional. Contemporaneously with the announcement of this case, we have determined in Gallegos [864] v. Phipps, 779 P.2d 856 (Colo.1989), that section 13-21-115 violates the equal protection provisions of the federal and state constitutions. U.S. Const, amend XIV; Colo. Const, art. II, § 25.

Accordingly, we vacate the summary judgment entered by the trial court granting summary judgment to appellee, and remand for further proceedings consistent with our opinion and holding in Gallegos.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Klausz v. Dillon Companies, 779 P.2d 863, 13 Brief Times Rptr. 1105, 1989 Colo. LEXIS 267, 1989 WL 106403 (Colo. 1989).

779 P.2d 863 (Klausz v. Dillon Companies) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gallegos v. Phipps
779 P.2d 856 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1989)