Klauss v. Marc Glassman, Inc.

99 Ohio St. 3d 305
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided July 23, 2003·No. No. 2003-0386·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is allowed.

{¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed and the cause is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings on the authority of Armstrong v. Best Buy Co., Inc., 99 Ohio St.3d 79, 2003-Ohio-2573, 788 N.E.2d 1088.

Moyer, C.J., F.E. Sweeney, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor and O’Donnell, JJ., concur. Resnick and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Klauss v. Marc Glassman, Inc., 99 Ohio St. 3d 305 (Ohio 2003).

99 Ohio St. 3d 305 (Klauss v. Marc Glassman, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Klauss v. Glassman, Unpublished Decision (3-24-2005)
2005 Ohio 1306 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2005)