Home/Ohio Supreme Court/Klauss v. Marc Glassman, Inc.

Klauss v. Marc Glassman, Inc.

99 Ohio St. 3d 305
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 23, 2003
DocketNo. 2003-0386
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 99 Ohio St. 3d 305 (Klauss v. Marc Glassman, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Klauss v. Marc Glassman, Inc., 99 Ohio St. 3d 305 (Ohio 2003).

Opinion

{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is allowed.

{¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed and the cause is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings on the authority of Armstrong v. Best Buy Co., Inc., 99 Ohio St.3d 79, 2003-Ohio-2573, 788 N.E.2d 1088.

Moyer, C.J., F.E. Sweeney, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor and O’Donnell, JJ., concur. Resnick and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Klauss v. Glassman, Unpublished Decision (3-24-2005)
2005 Ohio 1306 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
99 Ohio St. 3d 305, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/klauss-v-marc-glassman-inc-ohio-2003.