Klaub v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Klaub v. State

587 S.E.2d 145, 263 Ga. App. 101, 2003 Fulton County D. Rep. 2598, 2003 Ga. App. LEXIS 1042

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedAugust 21, 2003

DocketA03A1185

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 587 S.E.2d 145 (Klaub v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Klaub v. State, 587 S.E.2d 145, 263 Ga. App. 101, 2003 Fulton County D. Rep. 2598, 2003 Ga. App. LEXIS 1042 (Ga. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

Ruefin, Presiding Judge.

A jury found Ronald Klaub guilty of hit and run, driving with a suspended license, and two counts of vehicular homicide. Klaub appealed, asserting multiple enumerations of error. In Klaub v. State,1 we reversed Klaub’s conviction for one count of vehicular homicide and remanded the case for resentencing. Following the resentencing hearing, Klaub filed a second appeal, arguing that the trial court erred in failing to direct a verdict as to the second count of vehicular homicide and in charging the jury. Because res judicata bars Klaub’s claims, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

[102]*102Decided August 21, 2003 Reconsideration denied September 8, 2003 John R. Mayer, for appellant. Paul L. Howard, Jr., District Attorney, Alvera A. Wheeler, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.

“[R]es judicata bars the relitigation of all matters put in issue or which under the rules of law might have been put in issue” in a prior proceeding.² In the previous appeal, KLaub argued that the trial court erred in failing to grant a directed verdict as to the second count of vehicular homicide, and we rejected his argument.³ “It is axiomatic that the same issue cannot be relitigated ad infinitum. The same is true of appeals of the same issue on the same grounds.”⁴ Accordingly, he cannot relitigate the issue, and we cannot consider it on this appeal.

Similarly, Klaub’s allegations that the trial court erred in charging the jury could have or should have been raised in the earlier appeal. They are, therefore, barred by res judicata.⁵ As all issues are barred, we affirm Klaub’s judgment of conviction.

Judgment affirmed.

Smith, C. J., and Miller, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ruefin, Presiding Judge.

A jury found Ronald Klaub guilty of hit and run, driving with a suspended license, and two counts of vehicular homicide. Klaub appealed, asserting multiple enumerations of error. In Klaub v. State,1 we reversed Klaub’s conviction for one count of vehicular homicide and remanded the case for resentencing. Following the resentencing hearing, Klaub filed a second appeal, arguing that the trial court erred in failing to direct a verdict as to the second count of vehicular homicide and in charging the jury. Because res judicata bars Klaub’s claims, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

[102]*102Decided August 21, 2003 Reconsideration denied September 8, 2003 John R. Mayer, for appellant. Paul L. Howard, Jr., District Attorney, Alvera A. Wheeler, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.

“[R]es judicata bars the relitigation of all matters put in issue or which under the rules of law might have been put in issue” in a prior proceeding.² In the previous appeal, KLaub argued that the trial court erred in failing to grant a directed verdict as to the second count of vehicular homicide, and we rejected his argument.³ “It is axiomatic that the same issue cannot be relitigated ad infinitum. The same is true of appeals of the same issue on the same grounds.”⁴ Accordingly, he cannot relitigate the issue, and we cannot consider it on this appeal.

Similarly, Klaub’s allegations that the trial court erred in charging the jury could have or should have been raised in the earlier appeal. They are, therefore, barred by res judicata.⁵ As all issues are barred, we affirm Klaub’s judgment of conviction.

Judgment affirmed.

Smith, C. J., and Miller, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

587 S.E.2d 145, 263 Ga. App. 101, 2003 Fulton County D. Rep. 2598, 2003 Ga. App. LEXIS 1042, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/klaub-v-state-gactapp-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack