Klatt v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

861 So. 2d 97, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 19066, 2003 WL 22945695
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 16, 2003·No. No. 1D02-2624·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The final order is affirmed with the exception of those rulings pertaining to claimant’s colon and stomach conditions, which we reverse pursuant to Claims Management, Inc. v. Grenier, 111 So.2d 1039 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000). We remand to permit claimant to proceed with an independent medical examination (IME) by a physician who specializes in those conditions.

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED.

ERVIN, BOOTH and KAHN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Klatt v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 861 So. 2d 97, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 19066, 2003 WL 22945695 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

861 So. 2d 97 (Klatt v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Klatt v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
913 So. 2d 79 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)