Klatt v. N. C. Foster Lumber Co.

66 N.W. 793, 92 Wis. 628, 1896 Wisc. LEXIS 322
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Klatt v. N. C. Foster Lumber Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 97 Wis. 641
Wisconsin Supreme Court·Decided March 27, 1896·Published

Opinion

Newman, J.

This action grows out of the same accident as the case of Klatt v. N. C. Foster L. Co., ante, p. 622. It is the father’s action for his damages for the loss of the services of his minor son. In this case there is a stipulation that, in case this court shall hold in the son’s Case “ that the circuit court did not err in denying the defendant’s motion for the' direction of a verdict in its favor in said cause, then the said judgment so appealed from (in this case) shall be affirmed.” In that case the court did hold that it was not error for the court to refuse to direct a verdict for the defendant. So, by the terms of the stipulation, the judgment in this case should be affirmed.

By the Court.— The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Klatt v. N. C. Foster Lumber Co., 66 N.W. 793, 92 Wis. 628, 1896 Wisc. LEXIS 322 (Wis. 1896).

66 N.W. 793 (Klatt v. N. C. Foster Lumber Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.