Klarich v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Klarich v. State

760 So. 2d 150, 25 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 484, 2000 Fla. LEXIS 1229, 2000 WL 766599

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedJune 15, 2000

DocketNo. SC95705

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 760 So. 2d 150 (Klarich v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Klarich v. State, 760 So. 2d 150, 25 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 484, 2000 Fla. LEXIS 1229, 2000 WL 766599 (Fla. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have for review Klarich v. State, 730 So.2d 419 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999), a decision of the Fifth District Court of Appeal that cited as controlling authority Maddox v. State, 708 So.2d 617 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998), approved in part, disapproved in part, 760 So.2d 89 (Fla.2000). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.; Jollie v. State, 405 So.2d 418, 420 (Fla.1981). For the reasons expressed in our opinion in Maddox v. State, 760 So.2d 89 (Fla.2000), we approve the decision below and find that the unpreserved sentencing errors in this case do not constitute fundamental error.

It is so ordered.

HARDING, C.J., and SHAW, WELLS, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We have for review Klarich v. State, 730 So.2d 419 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999), a decision of the Fifth District Court of Appeal that cited as controlling authority Maddox v. State, 708 So.2d 617 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998), approved in part, disapproved in part, 760 So.2d 89 (Fla.2000). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.; Jollie v. State, 405 So.2d 418, 420 (Fla.1981). For the reasons expressed in our opinion in Maddox v. State, 760 So.2d 89 (Fla.2000), we approve the decision below and find that the unpreserved sentencing errors in this case do not constitute fundamental error.

It is so ordered.

HARDING, C.J., and SHAW, WELLS, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

760 So. 2d 150, 25 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 484, 2000 Fla. LEXIS 1229, 2000 WL 766599, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/klarich-v-state-fla-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack