Klar v. Safeway Inc.
This text of 70 F. App'x 982 (Klar v. Safeway Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Kathleen Klar appeals from the grant of summary judgment in favor of Safeway, Inc., in her action under Oregon law for wrongful constructive discharge. To prevail she must show that her working conditions were objectively intolerable, and that a reasonable person would have resigned on their account. McGanty v. Staudenraus, 321 Or. 532, 901 P.2d 841, 856-57 (1995). Klar received a favorable evaluation and resigned on the basis of a single, isolated incident. We agree with the reasoning of the district court that Klar was not constructively discharged, and we therefore affirm the grant of summary judgment.
AFFIRMED
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
70 F. App'x 982, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/klar-v-safeway-inc-ca9-2003.