Klapak v. Blum

New York Court of Appeals

Klapak v. Blum

65 N.Y. 670

New York Court of Appeals·Decided May 30, 1985·Published

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Judgment appealed from and order of the. Appellate Division brought up for review affirmed, with costs. The issue argued on appeal, not having been considered by the administrative agency in making its determination, may not be reviewed by this court (Matter of Barry v O’Connell, 303 NY 46).

Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Meyer, Simons, Kaye and Alexander. Taking no part: Judge Titone.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

Judgment appealed from and order of the. Appellate Division brought up for review affirmed, with costs. The issue argued on appeal, not having been considered by the administrative agency in making its determination, may not be reviewed by this court (Matter of Barry v O’Connell, 303 NY 46).

Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Meyer, Simons, Kaye and Alexander. Taking no part: Judge Titone.

Klapak v. Blum, 65 N.Y. 670 (N.Y. 1985).

Pincite

65 N.Y. 670 (Klapak v. Blum) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related