Klapak v. Blum

New York Court of Appeals

Klapak v. Blum

65 N.Y. 670

DecidedMay 30, 1985

StatusPublished

This text of 65 N.Y. 670 (Klapak v. Blum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Klapak v. Blum, 65 N.Y. 670 (N.Y. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Judgment appealed from and order of the. Appellate Division brought up for review affirmed, with costs. The issue argued on appeal, not having been considered by the administrative agency in making its determination, may not be reviewed by this court (Matter of Barry v O’Connell, 303 NY 46).

Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Meyer, Simons, Kaye and Alexander. Taking no part: Judge Titone.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

Judgment appealed from and order of the. Appellate Division brought up for review affirmed, with costs. The issue argued on appeal, not having been considered by the administrative agency in making its determination, may not be reviewed by this court (Matter of Barry v O’Connell, 303 NY 46).

Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Meyer, Simons, Kaye and Alexander. Taking no part: Judge Titone.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

65 N.Y. 670, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/klapak-v-blum-ny-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack