Klag v. DRUG & CHEM. CLUB, INC.
This text of 114 N.E.2d 434 (Klag v. DRUG & CHEM. CLUB, INC.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Claim of Fred C. Klag, Appellant,
v.
Drug & Chemical Club, Inc., et al., Respondents. Workmen's Compensation Board, Respondent.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.
Abraham Markhoff for appellant.
Herbert F. Hastings, Jr., and Florence G. Mann for Drug & Chemical Club, Inc., and another, respondents.
Valentine A. Meehan, Leo D. Fitzgerald and Eugene T. O'Neill for Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States, respondent.
Nathaniel L. Goldstein, Attorney-General (John J. Quinn, Wendell P. Brown and Roy Wiedersum of counsel), for Workmen's Compensation Board, respondent.
Concur: CONWAY, DESMOND, FULD and FROESSEL, JJ. LEWIS, Ch. J., DYE and VAN VOORHIS, JJ., dissent and vote to affirm.
Order of the Appellate Division reversed, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Division, upon the dissenting memorandum in the Appellate Division, and matter remitted to the Workmen's Compensation Board for further proceedings in accordance with that memorandum. No opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
114 N.E.2d 434, 305 N.Y. 900, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/klag-v-drug-chem-club-inc-ny-1953.