K.J.S. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

K.J.S. v. State

937 So. 2d 1174, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 14828, 2006 WL 2527248

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 5, 2006·No. No. 1D06-1846·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the revocation of probation as amply supported by the record. The remaining issues raised by appellant, includ[1175]*1175ing those related to assessment of costs, fees and surcharges, were unpreserved by either a timely objection or a motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Juvenile Procedure 8.135(b)(2) and do not implicate fundamental error. Accordingly, we may not consider them. See generally A.M.P. v. State, 927 So.2d 97 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006).

AFFIRMED.

ERVIN, WEBSTER, and HAWKES, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the revocation of probation as amply supported by the record. The remaining issues raised by appellant, includ[1175]*1175ing those related to assessment of costs, fees and surcharges, were unpreserved by either a timely objection or a motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Juvenile Procedure 8.135(b)(2) and do not implicate fundamental error. Accordingly, we may not consider them. See generally A.M.P. v. State, 927 So.2d 97 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006).

AFFIRMED.

ERVIN, WEBSTER, and HAWKES, JJ., concur.

K.J.S. v. State, 937 So. 2d 1174, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 14828, 2006 WL 2527248 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

937 So. 2d 1174 (K.J.S. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related