Kjellman v. Rogers

Ninth Circuit

Kjellman v. Rogers

109 F. 1061, 47 C.C.A. 684, 1 Alaska Fed. 713, 1901 U.S. App. LEXIS 4290

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedMay 17, 1901

DocketNo. 636

StatusPublished

This text of 109 F. 1061 (Kjellman v. Rogers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kjellman v. Rogers, 109 F. 1061, 47 C.C.A. 684, 1 Alaska Fed. 713, 1901 U.S. App. LEXIS 4290 (9th Cir. 1901).

Pincite

Opinion

GILBERT, Circuit Judge.

The facts in this case are similar to those in the preceding cases of Tornanses v. Melsing, 109 Fed. 710, and Nackkela v. Webster, ubi supra. The appeal is from an order appointing a receiver of placer-mining claim No. 2 below Discovery, on Anvil creek, a tributary to Snake river, in the Cape Nome mining district, Alaska. Upon the grounds expressed in the opinion in the case of Tornanses v. Mel-sing, the order appointing a receiver is reversed, and the cause remanded, with instructions to dismiss the bill. See 106 Fed. 775.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GILBERT, Circuit Judge.

The facts in this case are similar to those in the preceding cases of Tornanses v. Melsing, 109 Fed. 710, and Nackkela v. Webster, ubi supra. The appeal is from an order appointing a receiver of placer-mining claim No. 2 below Discovery, on Anvil creek, a tributary to Snake river, in the Cape Nome mining district, Alaska. Upon the grounds expressed in the opinion in the case of Tornanses v. Mel-sing, the order appointing a receiver is reversed, and the cause remanded, with instructions to dismiss the bill. See 106 Fed. 775.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

109 F. 1061, 47 C.C.A. 684, 1 Alaska Fed. 713, 1901 U.S. App. LEXIS 4290, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kjellman-v-rogers-ca9-1901.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack