Kjellman v. Rogers

Ninth Circuit

Kjellman v. Rogers

109 F. 1061, 47 C.C.A. 684, 1 Alaska Fed. 713, 1901 U.S. App. LEXIS 4290

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided May 17, 1901·No. No. 636·Published

Opinion

GILBERT, Circuit Judge.

The facts in this case are similar to those in the preceding cases of Tornanses v. Melsing, 109 Fed. 710, and Nackkela v. Webster, ubi supra. The appeal is from an order appointing a receiver of placer-mining claim No. 2 below Discovery, on Anvil creek, a tributary to Snake river, in the Cape Nome mining district, Alaska. Upon the grounds expressed in the opinion in the case of Tornanses v. Mel-sing, the order appointing a receiver is reversed, and the cause remanded, with instructions to dismiss the bill. See 106 Fed. 775.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GILBERT, Circuit Judge.

The facts in this case are similar to those in the preceding cases of Tornanses v. Melsing, 109 Fed. 710, and Nackkela v. Webster, ubi supra. The appeal is from an order appointing a receiver of placer-mining claim No. 2 below Discovery, on Anvil creek, a tributary to Snake river, in the Cape Nome mining district, Alaska. Upon the grounds expressed in the opinion in the case of Tornanses v. Mel-sing, the order appointing a receiver is reversed, and the cause remanded, with instructions to dismiss the bill. See 106 Fed. 775.

Kjellman v. Rogers, 109 F. 1061, 47 C.C.A. 684, 1 Alaska Fed. 713, 1901 U.S. App. LEXIS 4290 (9th Cir. 1901).

Pincite

109 F. 1061 (Kjellman v. Rogers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related