Kjellgren Realty Corp. v. Galop, Inc.

26 Misc. 2d 30, 207 N.Y.S.2d 637, 1960 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2266
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 28, 1960
StatusPublished

This text of 26 Misc. 2d 30 (Kjellgren Realty Corp. v. Galop, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kjellgren Realty Corp. v. Galop, Inc., 26 Misc. 2d 30, 207 N.Y.S.2d 637, 1960 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2266 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1960).

Opinion

Bernard S. Meyer, J.

Motion for extension of a stay pending appeal. The judgment granted a stay of 30 days pursuant to section 615 of the Civil Practice Act which specifically provides “ that execution of a judgment or order for the recovery of money only shall not be stayed without security for more than thirty days ”. The stay contained in the judgment expired before the present order to show cause was obtained, but movant claims it was delayed in perfecting its appeal because of its adversary’s failure to return a transcript of the minutes.

Section 615 of the Civil Practice Act specifically prohibits what movant now requests. Further, section 614 makes clear that ‘ ‘ the appeal does not stay the execution of the judgment ’ ’ ; failure to return the transcript has no bearing, therefore, since perfection of an appeal, without the filing of an undertaking, would have no bearing. There is, of course, and has been since the filing of the notice of appeal a right to apply to the Appellate Division for a stay under section 613 of the Civil Practice Act. Whatever movant’s rights may be in that court, no facts have been asserted on this motion that would justify the granting of a stay without security even if the court had the power to do so (Reldan Trading Corp. v. Hause, 13 Misc 2d 773). For all of the foregoing reasons the requested stay is denied, but no objection having been made to movant’s request therefor, the stay contained in the order to show cause has been extended by indorsement on the order to show cause until 5:00 p.m., November 3, 1960 to allow movant time to apply to the Appellate Division pursuant to section 613.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Reldan Trading Corp. v. Hause
13 Misc. 2d 773 (New York Supreme Court, 1958)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
26 Misc. 2d 30, 207 N.Y.S.2d 637, 1960 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2266, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kjellgren-realty-corp-v-galop-inc-nysupct-1960.