K.J.C. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

K.J.C. v. State

26 So. 3d 690, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 579

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 29, 2010

DocketNo. 1D09-648

StatusPublished

This text of 26 So. 3d 690 (K.J.C. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

K.J.C. v. State, 26 So. 3d 690, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 579 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant raises two issues on appeal: first, whether the trial court erred by exceeding its statutory authority when it increased the commitment level upon a motion of a party other than the Department; and second, whether this court should remand with instructions to enter an amended disposition order which deletes the attachments suggesting Appellant is subject to post-commitment probation. We AFFIRM the first issue on the merits, but REMAND as to the second issue, with instructions for the trial court to enter an amended disposition order without the attachments, which indicate Appellant is subject to post-commitment probation. The State concedes there was no post-commitment probation ordered and does not oppose correction of the scrivener’s error. See Smith v. State, 614 So.2d 602 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993).

VAN NORTWICK, PADOVANO and ROWE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant raises two issues on appeal: first, whether the trial court erred by exceeding its statutory authority when it increased the commitment level upon a motion of a party other than the Department; and second, whether this court should remand with instructions to enter an amended disposition order which deletes the attachments suggesting Appellant is subject to post-commitment probation. We AFFIRM the first issue on the merits, but REMAND as to the second issue, with instructions for the trial court to enter an amended disposition order without the attachments, which indicate Appellant is subject to post-commitment probation. The State concedes there was no post-commitment probation ordered and does not oppose correction of the scrivener’s error. See Smith v. State, 614 So.2d 602 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993).

VAN NORTWICK, PADOVANO and ROWE, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

26 So. 3d 690, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 579, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kjc-v-state-fladistctapp-2010.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack