K.J. v. State

84 So. 3d 1285, 2012 WL 1414331, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 6382
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in K.J. v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 2825
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 25, 2012·No. No. 3D11-1771·Published

Opinion

ON CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

On this appeal from a restitution order entered after a plea to burglary, the State concedes, and we agree, that the trial court reversibly erred in failing to grant a brief continuance so that the assistant public defender assigned to the case could appear and instead forcing the respondent to be represented by two other assistants who were entirely unfamiliar with the case. See M.F. v. State, 920 So.2d 1252 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006). Accordingly, the order under review is reversed for a new restitution [1286]*1286hearing.1

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

K.J. v. State, 84 So. 3d 1285, 2012 WL 1414331, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 6382 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

84 So. 3d 1285 (K.J. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

M.F. v. State
920 So. 2d 1252 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)