Kizer v. Downey

1 Del. 530
Superior Court of Delaware·Decided July 5, 1835·Published

Opinion

The Court

overruled this allegation of diminution. The cause of action as stated by the record was an account; and the Justice is not bound to send up the evidence by which it was sustained.

He then excepted to the original process because it appeared by the record that the deft, was a freeholder of the county. The act of assembly requires that a process against a freeholder shall be a summons and not a copias, (sec. 2.)

The Court overruled this exception and affirmed the judgment. The deft, submitted to go into a trial without objecting to the process on which he was arrested; and the irregularity in the form of the process does not affect the jurisdiction. Freehold is a privilege that the party ought to avail himself of at a proper time: it would become the means of great injustice if it could be waived at one time and afterwards set up to avoid the judgment.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kizer v. Downey, 1 Del. 530 (Del. Ct. App. 1835).

1 Del. 530 (Kizer v. Downey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.