Kivisto v. Miller, Canfield, Paddock & Stone, PLC
181 L. Ed. 2d 441, 132 S. Ct. 577, 565 U.S. 1045, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 8100, 80 U.S.L.W. 3298
This text of 181 L. Ed. 2d 441 (Kivisto v. Miller, Canfield, Paddock & Stone, PLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Kivisto v. Miller, Canfield, Paddock & Stone, PLC, 181 L. Ed. 2d 441, 132 S. Ct. 577, 565 U.S. 1045, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 8100, 80 U.S.L.W. 3298 (U.S. 2011).
Opinion
Motion of petitioner to defer consideration of the petition for writ of certiorari denied. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Same case below, 413 Fed. Appx. 136.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Jussi K. Kivisto vs Miller, Canfield, Paddock & Stone, PLC
413 F. App'x 136 (Eleventh Circuit, 2011)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
181 L. Ed. 2d 441, 132 S. Ct. 577, 565 U.S. 1045, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 8100, 80 U.S.L.W. 3298, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kivisto-v-miller-canfield-paddock-stone-plc-scotus-2011.