Kivimaki v. Cvek

208 N.W.2d 96, 296 Minn. 529, 1973 Minn. LEXIS 1269
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedJune 8, 1973
DocketNo. 43736
StatusPublished

This text of 208 N.W.2d 96 (Kivimaki v. Cvek) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kivimaki v. Cvek, 208 N.W.2d 96, 296 Minn. 529, 1973 Minn. LEXIS 1269 (Mich. 1973).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The issue in this case is simply whether the evidence was sufficient to support the finding of the trial court that a legally binding purchase agreement existed between the parties. We hold that it was.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
208 N.W.2d 96, 296 Minn. 529, 1973 Minn. LEXIS 1269, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kivimaki-v-cvek-minn-1973.