Kivat v. Kivat

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kivat v. Kivat

232 A.D.2d 530, 648 N.Y.S.2d 977, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10440

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 21, 1996·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—In a matrimonial action in which the parties were divorced by a judgment dated June 26, 1987, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Posner, J.), dated August 28, 1995, which denied his motion, inter alia, to amend the judgment.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

We agree with the Supreme Court that the plaintiff has failed to come forward with evidence that the language of the judgment of divorce, which was drafted by his own attorney, requires amendment. Rosenblatt, J. P., Thompson, Santucci, Altman and Hart, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a matrimonial action in which the parties were divorced by a judgment dated June 26, 1987, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Posner, J.), dated August 28, 1995, which denied his motion, inter alia, to amend the judgment.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

We agree with the Supreme Court that the plaintiff has failed to come forward with evidence that the language of the judgment of divorce, which was drafted by his own attorney, requires amendment. Rosenblatt, J. P., Thompson, Santucci, Altman and Hart, JJ., concur.

Kivat v. Kivat, 232 A.D.2d 530, 648 N.Y.S.2d 977, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10440 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

232 A.D.2d 530 (Kivat v. Kivat) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related