Kivalina Relocation Planning Committee v. Teck Cominco Alaska Inc.
This text of 141 F. App'x 650 (Kivalina Relocation Planning Committee v. Teck Cominco Alaska Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Kivalina Relocation Planning Committee (KRPC) appeals the district court’s denial of its Rule 59(e) and Rule 15(a) motions. For the reasons stated by the district court, we AFFIRM.
We DENY KRPC’s Rule 21 motion, as well as KRPC’s Motion to Strike Motion by Northwest Arctic Borough to Dismiss Appeal and to strike NAB as a party to the Appellees’ brief.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
141 F. App'x 650, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kivalina-relocation-planning-committee-v-teck-cominco-alaska-inc-ca9-2005.