Kitz Corp. v. Transcon Shipping Specialists, Inc.

221 A.D.2d 261, 634 N.Y.S.2d 75, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12173
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 28, 1995·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Bertram Katz, J.) entered July 27, 1994, which, to the extent appealed from, denied third-party defendant-appellant J&J Air Freight Trucking Co.’s motion for partial summary judgment declaring that its liability, if any, is contractually limited to $50, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

A party that is a stranger to a contract of carriage is not bound by limitations of liability in that contract (cf., Abdul[262]*262Haq v Pakistan Inti. Airlines, 101 Misc 2d 213, 214). No party had authority as an agent or otherwise to bind defendant to a limitation of J&J’s liability. Nor is there evidence of any prior dealing between J&J and defendant and third-party plaintiff. Accordingly, summary judgment was properly denied to J&J. Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Rubin, Kupferman, Asch and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kitz Corp. v. Transcon Shipping Specialists, Inc., 221 A.D.2d 261, 634 N.Y.S.2d 75, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12173 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

221 A.D.2d 261 (Kitz Corp. v. Transcon Shipping Specialists, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

US Airways, Inc. v. Qwest Corp.
361 P.3d 942 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2015)
ABN AMRO VERZEKERINGEN BV v. Geologistics Americas, Inc.
253 F. Supp. 2d 757 (S.D. New York, 2003)