Kittridge v. Miller
This text of 8 N.W. 94 (Kittridge v. Miller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Kittridge sued Miller in replevin for the skin of a fox, which he claimed because the animal was first started and wounded by him, and chased to earth by his dog, and finally caught by the dog and killed by his help. As there is no evidence whatever tending to show that Miller had or claimed any interest in, or control over, the skin, there was no ground for an action of replevin, and we shall not discuss the respective interests of the several men and dogs that killed the fox.
This case, which involved only one dollar and a half, was brought in the circuit court, and not before a justice. While the former may have jurisdiction it certainly ought not to have it, and probably was not intended to have it. Such a case should not have been brought there, and is evidently a matter of bad feeling and not of serious grievance. Neither the public nor the parties should have been put to the expense of such a litigation.
The judgment must be affirmed with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
8 N.W. 94, 45 Mich. 478, 1881 Mich. LEXIS 757, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kittridge-v-miller-mich-1881.