Kittrell v. United States of America

CourtDistrict Court, District of Columbia
DecidedNovember 16, 2012
DocketCivil Action No. 2012-1859
StatusPublished

This text of Kittrell v. United States of America (Kittrell v. United States of America) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kittrell v. United States of America, (D.D.C. 2012).

Opinion

FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NOV 1 6 2012 FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Clerk, U.S. District & Bankruptcy Courts for the District of Columbia Adam Troy Kittrell, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 12 1859 ) ) United States of America, ) ) Respondent. )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The petitioner, proceeding prose, has submitted an application for a writ of habeas

corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, along with an application to proceed in forma pauperis. The

Court will grant the application to proceed in forma pauperis and will dismiss the case for lack

of jurisdiction.

The petitioner is a North Carolina state prisoner incarcerated at the Johnston Correctional

Institution in Smithfield, North Carolina. He is challenging his state conviction following his

plea of guilty. See Petition at 1, 6. Federal court review of state convictions is available under

28 U.S.C. § 2254 only after the exhaustion of available state remedies. See 28 U.S.C.

§2254(b)(1 ). Thereafter, "an application for a writ of habeas corpus [] made by a person in

custody under the judgment and sentence of a State court ... may be filed in the district court for

the district wherein such person is in custody or in the district court for the district within which

the State court was held which convicted and sentenced [petitioner] and each of such district

3 courts shall have concurrent jurisdiction to entertain the application." 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d). 1 Because the petitioner has no recourse in the District of Columbia, this action will be dismissed.

Date: October :2.t, 2012

A separate Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Kittrell v. United States of America, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kittrell-v-united-states-of-america-dcd-2012.