Kittrell v. State
This text of 125 So. 3d 1027 (Kittrell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant challenges his convictions and sentences on ten counts of capital sexual battery, eight counts of lewd or lascivious molestation, and one count of lewd or lascivious exhibition. We affirm the convictions and sentences on all counts except Counts 1, 4, 8, 15 and 19. Because the State failed to introduce independent evidence to prove these counts, it was error to admit Appellant’s confession to these crimes and Appellant is entitled to a new trial.1 See Corona v. State, 64 So.3d 1232 (Fla.2011) (ordering new trial after concluding that without confession, permissible evidence failed to establish corpus de-licti of charged crime).
AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part and REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
125 So. 3d 1027, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 11367, 2013 WL 3761543, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kittrell-v-state-fladistctapp-2013.