Kittrell v. State

125 So. 3d 1027, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 11367, 2013 WL 3761543
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 19, 2013·No. No. 5D11-3563·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant challenges his convictions and sentences on ten counts of capital sexual battery, eight counts of lewd or lascivious molestation, and one count of lewd or lascivious exhibition. We affirm the convictions and sentences on all counts except Counts 1, 4, 8, 15 and 19. Because the State failed to introduce independent evidence to prove these counts, it was error to admit Appellant’s confession to these crimes and Appellant is entitled to a new trial.1 See Corona v. State, 64 So.3d 1232 (Fla.2011) (ordering new trial after concluding that without confession, permissible evidence failed to establish corpus de-licti of charged crime).

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part and REMANDED.

TORPY, C.J., LAWSON and BERGER, JJ., concur.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kittrell v. State, 125 So. 3d 1027, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 11367, 2013 WL 3761543 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

125 So. 3d 1027 (Kittrell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Corona v. State
64 So. 3d 1232 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2011)