Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Kittrell v. Kittrell

Kittrell v. Kittrell

146 So. 3d 1288, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 14695, 2014 WL 4656594
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 19, 2014
DocketNo. 1D14-1918
StatusPublished

This text of 146 So. 3d 1288 (Kittrell v. Kittrell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kittrell v. Kittrell, 146 So. 3d 1288, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 14695, 2014 WL 4656594 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied on the merits. See Hedrick v. State, 6 So.3d 688, 693 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009) (holding that trial judge was not required to rule on motion to disqualify which was never served on judge as required by Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.330(c)); Thomas v. State, Dept, of Revenue, 74 So.3d 145 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011) (stating that absent a showing that an express and distinct demand for performance was made, mandamus will not lie to compel a court to rule on a pleading in a civil matter).

WOLF, RAY, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hedrick v. State
6 So. 3d 688 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)
Thomas v. State, Department of Revenue
74 So. 3d 145 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
146 So. 3d 1288, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 14695, 2014 WL 4656594, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kittrell-v-kittrell-fladistctapp-2014.