Kittredge v. Russell
114 Mass. 67
This text of 114 Mass. 67 (Kittredge v. Russell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Kittredge v. Russell, 114 Mass. 67 (Mass. 1873).
Opinion
The refusal to grant a continuance is not a subject of exception. Evidence of the defendant’s admissions is competent in support of the plaintiff’s case, and the witness may testify to the substance of them if he cannot remember the exact words. The evidence introduced by the plaintiff not being reported, it does not appear that there was a variance.
Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Commonwealth v. Solomonsen
735 N.E.2d 411 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 2000)
Commonwealth v. Bonomi
140 N.E.2d 140 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1957)
Colazzi v. Pearson
5 Mass. App. Div. 487 (Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div., 1940)
Noble v. Mead-Morrison Manufacturing Co.
129 N.E. 669 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1921)
Soper v. Manning
33 N.E. 516 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1893)
Childs v. New Haven & Northampton Co.
133 Mass. 253 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1882)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
114 Mass. 67, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kittredge-v-russell-mass-1873.