Kittle v. Woodward

Michigan Supreme Court

Kittle v. Woodward

1 McGrath 1616

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedAugust 2, 1894

DocketNo. 14437

StatusPublished

This text of 1 McGrath 1616 (Kittle v. Woodward) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kittle v. Woodward, 1 McGrath 1616 (Mich. 1894).

Pincite

Opinion

To compel respondent to allow relator, an attomey-at-law, to examine the records and files in respondent’s office; to enter motions or orders in the motion and order books; to receive and file and record cases, and to grant to relator the rights and privileges to which he is entitled as an attorney.

Application filed August 2, 1894.

Order to show cause granted October 3, 1894.

Writ granted, in the absence of return, with costs, October 23, 1894. The petition set forth that the Circuit Court was not in session and that no term of court would be held in that county until January next.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

To compel respondent to allow relator, an attomey-at-law, to examine the records and files in respondent’s office; to enter motions or orders in the motion and order books; to receive and file and record cases, and to grant to relator the rights and privileges to which he is entitled as an attorney.

Application filed August 2, 1894.

Order to show cause granted October 3, 1894.

Writ granted, in the absence of return, with costs, October 23, 1894. The petition set forth that the Circuit Court was not in session and that no term of court would be held in that county until January next.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 McGrath 1616, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kittle-v-woodward-mich-1894.