Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Kittle v. State

Kittle v. State

245 A.D. 401, 284 N.Y.S. 657, 1935 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10318
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 13, 1935
DocketClaim No. 22246
StatusPublished
Cited by15 cases

This text of 245 A.D. 401 (Kittle v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kittle v. State, 245 A.D. 401, 284 N.Y.S. 657, 1935 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10318 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Opinions

Per Curiam.

Claimant’s intestate, a girl sixteen years of age, came to her death on September 27, 1930, by falling from a cliff in Thacher State Park. The locality of her fall includes the topographical phenomena described by the park authorities as “ The Crevice ” and the “ Bear Path.” Originally the crevice was a natural fissure between two ledges of rock extending downward from the surface at a ninety degree angle about thirty-five feet to the bear path, a narrow walk along the face of the cliff fifty feet above its base. The natural fissure once known as “ Fat Man’s Misery ” has been widened by blasting to accommodate well-nourished persons, and a ladder installed from the surface to within about fifteen feet of the bottom. From the lower end of the ladder there is a steep, rough and rocky slope to the bear path. There [402]*402were no guard rails. Claimant’s intestate, proceeding down the rocky slope from the lower end of the ladder, fell over the edge fifty feet downward to the base of the cliff.

The park was for the use of the general public. It was maintained at State expense. Descriptive literature entitled “An Invitation ” had been distributed. Thacher Park therein was described as “ one of the most interesting of the smaller State parks.” Within its boundaries signs were maintained telling the route to the crevice, bear path and caves to which the path led. There were no signs indicating danger posted at any place, and nothing to give warning of the steep, rocky path from the foot of the ladder with the sheer drop of fifty feet near at hand. The failure to warn, together with the lack of guard rails, constituted negligence and created liability on the part of the State, and this whether visitors are to be classified as invitees or licensees.

The judgment should be affirmed.

Hill, P. J., Crapser, Bliss and Heffernan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Herman v. State
94 A.D.2d 161 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
Herman v. State
109 Misc. 2d 455 (New York State Court of Claims, 1981)
Burkart v. State
50 Misc. 2d 912 (New York State Court of Claims, 1966)
Brzostowski v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co.
16 A.D.2d 196 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1962)
Malvaso v. State
15 Misc. 2d 585 (New York State Court of Claims, 1959)
Mitchell v. State
193 Misc. 507 (New York State Court of Claims, 1948)
Juliano v. State
190 Misc. 180 (New York State Court of Claims, 1947)
Ziehm v. State
270 A.D. 876 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1946)
Bowles v. State
186 Misc. 295 (New York State Court of Claims, 1946)
Brown v. State
2 Misc. 2d 307 (New York State Court of Claims, 1945)
Parry v. State
193 Misc. 875 (New York State Court of Claims, 1945)
Trimble v. State
263 A.D. 233 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1942)
Hall v. State
173 Misc. 903 (New York State Court of Claims, 1940)
Griffin v. State
250 A.D. 244 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1937)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
245 A.D. 401, 284 N.Y.S. 657, 1935 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10318, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kittle-v-state-nyappdiv-1935.