Kittle v. Rogers

33 F. 49, 1887 U.S. App. LEXIS 2904

This text of 33 F. 49 (Kittle v. Rogers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kittle v. Rogers, 33 F. 49, 1887 U.S. App. LEXIS 2904 (circtsdny 1887).

Opinion

Coxe, J.

There is nothing in these causes which distinguishes them from Kittle v. De Graaf, 30 Fed. Rep. 689. It is thought that the language there quoted from Clark v. Wooster, 119 U. S. 322, 7 Sup. Ct. Rep. 217, is sufficiently comprehensive to include a case where the objection disputing the jurisdiction of the court is taken at the earliest possible moment. Although the point was in that case first presented upon appeal, the decision is clearly to the effect that the trial court may retain jurisdiction, if, at the time the bill is filed, the complainant may obtain the equitable relief prayed for.

The demurrers are overruled. The defendants may answer within 20 "days.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Clark v. Wooster
119 U.S. 322 (Supreme Court, 1886)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
33 F. 49, 1887 U.S. App. LEXIS 2904, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kittle-v-rogers-circtsdny-1887.