Kittle v. Buxton
This text of 55 Va. Cir. 189 (Kittle v. Buxton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Fairfax County Circuit Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This matter comes before the Court on Defendant’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and Motion in Limine.
The basis for each Motion is essentially the same, namely that subsequent to the automobile accident which gives rise to this lawsuit, the Plaintiff filed a Chapter 7 Petition in Bankruptcy. This inchoate claim was obviously in existence at the time of the bankruptcy filing and indeed the medical bills incurred allegedly as a result of die accident were listed as debts of the estate. For some reason, the claim itself was not listed as an asset of the estate. Those bills were discharged with the bankruptcy just after this suit was filed. The Discharge in Bankruptcy Order was dated September 3,1999.
The Motion for Partial Summary Judgment asserts that the plaintiff lacks standing to bring filis action as only file trustee of the Plaintiff’s bankrupt estate may do so. Of course, the Plaintiff may bring the claim in her own right if the trustee in bankruptcy abandoned it. Obviously, that could not have occurred here because the trustee was not aware of the claim because it was not listed on the Plaintiff’s schedules in bankruptcy. The Defendant is correct [190]*190Tignor v. Parkinson, 729 F.2d 977, 981 (4th Cir. 1984); accord, Field v. Transcontinental Ins. Co., 219 B.R. 115 (E.D. Va. 1998).
[189]*189The debtor’s claim for injuries to file person, whether unliquidated as when file petition was filed... are... property of file bankrupt estate as of the commencement of the case.
[190]*190When the Plaintiff filed for bankruptcy protection, she transferred all of her assets and liabilities to her trustee in bankruptcy. Those assets included this claim, the cause of action, for personal injuries. Only her trustee could then, or now, assert this claim on her behalf.
The Motion for Summary Judgment is granted.
The grant of the Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, though styled “partial” by the Defendant, is dispositive of all matters in this case. The grant of summary judgment renders it utmecessary for the Court to address the Motion in Limine.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
55 Va. Cir. 189, 2001 Va. Cir. LEXIS 51, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kittle-v-buxton-vaccfairfax-2001.