Kittle Property Group, Inc. v. the City of Texas City, the City Commission of Texas City, the Texas City Engineering and Planning Department, and the Planning Board of Texas City
This text of Kittle Property Group, Inc. v. the City of Texas City, the City Commission of Texas City, the Texas City Engineering and Planning Department, and the Planning Board of Texas City (Kittle Property Group, Inc. v. the City of Texas City, the City Commission of Texas City, the Texas City Engineering and Planning Department, and the Planning Board of Texas City) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion issued May 14, 2024
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-24-00121-CV ——————————— KITTLE PROPERTY GROUP, INC., Appellant V. THE CITY OF TEXAS CITY, THE CITY COMMISSION OF TEXAS CITY, THE TEXAS CITY ENGINEERING AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT, AND THE PLANNING BOARD OF TEXAS CITY, Appellees
On Appeal from the 405th District Court Galveston County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 23-CV-1616
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant, Kittle Property Group, Inc., filed a notice of appeal from the trial
court’s January 25, 2024 order sustaining the plea to the jurisdiction filed by
appellees, The City of Texas City, The City Commission of Texas City, The Texas City Engineering and Planning Department, and The Planning Board of Texas City
(collectively, “appellees”). On April 25, 2024, appellant filed a motion to dismiss
its appeal, stating that appellant “no longer desire[d] to pursue its appeal and hereby
s[ought] to voluntarily dismiss the appeal.”
No other party has filed a notice of appeal, and no opinion has issued. See
TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1), (c). Appellant’s motion does not include a certificate of
conference, but states that appellees do not oppose the relief requested in the motion.
See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.1(a)(5), 10.3(a)(2).
Accordingly, the Court grants appellant’s motion and dismisses the appeal.
See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f). We dismiss all other pending motions as
moot.
PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Landau, Countiss, and Guerra.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Kittle Property Group, Inc. v. the City of Texas City, the City Commission of Texas City, the Texas City Engineering and Planning Department, and the Planning Board of Texas City, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kittle-property-group-inc-v-the-city-of-texas-city-the-city-commission-texapp-2024.