Kittinger v. Churchill Evangelistic Ass'n

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kittinger v. Churchill Evangelistic Ass'n

244 A.D. 876

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 15, 1935·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Judgment so far as appealed from affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: In affirming this judgment, we do not interpret it as constituting an adjudiea[877] tion of the character of stock ownership by the plaintiff, the defendant Clinton H. Churchill, or the representatives of Sarah H. Churchill, in The Churchill Evangelistic Association, Inc. All concur. (The judgment decrees the proportionate ownership of shares on expiration of a voting trust agreement.) Present — Sears, P. J., Edgcomb, Thompson, Crosby and Lewis, JJ. [151 Misc. 350.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment so far as appealed from affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: In affirming this judgment, we do not interpret it as constituting an adjudiea[877] tion of the character of stock ownership by the plaintiff, the defendant Clinton H. Churchill, or the representatives of Sarah H. Churchill, in The Churchill Evangelistic Association, Inc. All concur. (The judgment decrees the proportionate ownership of shares on expiration of a voting trust agreement.) Present — Sears, P. J., Edgcomb, Thompson, Crosby and Lewis, JJ. [151 Misc. 350.]

Kittinger v. Churchill Evangelistic Ass'n, 244 A.D. 876 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

244 A.D. 876 (Kittinger v. Churchill Evangelistic Ass'n) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related