Kittinger v. Churchill Evangelistic Ass'n
This text of 244 A.D. 876 (Kittinger v. Churchill Evangelistic Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment so far as appealed from affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: In affirming this judgment, we do not interpret it as constituting an adjudiea[877]*877tion of the character of stock ownership by the plaintiff, the defendant Clinton H. Churchill, or the representatives of Sarah H. Churchill, in The Churchill Evangelistic Association, Inc. All concur. (The judgment decrees the proportionate ownership of shares on expiration of a voting trust agreement.) Present — Sears, P. J., Edgcomb, Thompson, Crosby and Lewis, JJ. [151 Misc. 350.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
244 A.D. 876, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kittinger-v-churchill-evangelistic-assn-nyappdiv-1935.