Kittel v. Steger

121 Tenn. 400
CourtTennessee Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 15, 1908
StatusPublished
Cited by27 cases

This text of 121 Tenn. 400 (Kittel v. Steger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Tennessee Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kittel v. Steger, 121 Tenn. 400 (Tenn. 1908).

Opinion

Mr. Justioe Neil delivered

the opinion of the Court.

This is an action of ejectment, brought in the circuit court of Van Burén county, to recover about two hundred acres of land described as follows: Beginning at a stake painted white, where the west boundary line of grant, No. 6808, to J. A. Lane for one thousand acres crosses the south boundary line of grant, No. 9209, granted to James and O. H. P. Seals for one thousand acres, and running thence east to the' said Seals line twenty-two poles to the center of Glade creek; thence down said creek as it meanders to its mouth; thence down Bee creek as it meanders to the west boundary line of grant, No. 6808; thence south with said line one hundred and fifty poles to the beginning.

The general issue was interposed by the defendant below, who is the plaintiff in error here.

[403]*403The case was tried before Hon. Joseph 0. Higgins, circuit judge, who, at the request of the parties, reduced his findings of fact and law to writing, and the case comes before ns on these findings; there being no bill of exceptions.

It is unnecessary to set out these findings in full. We shall give only the substance of them, so far • as they affect the questions now before the court for disposition.

His honor rendered judgment on these findings in favor of the plaintiff below.

From this judgment the defendant below brought the case to this court by writ of error, and has here assigned errors. In what we shall hereafter say we shall dispose of these various errors assigned as far as may be necessary.

In order that the findings referred to may be more easily and fully understood, we attach to this opinion a map, shown on page 404, which we find with the brief of the counsel for defendant in error. Its accuracy is not questioned by counsel for plaintiff in error, and it presents the controversy more plainly and simply than does the blue print found in the record.

From section 1 of the findings it appears that the Groves grant was the oldest of the three grants mentioned, and hence carried the better title, or, as we should more properly say, the'title. It also appears from this finding that the grantees under the Seals grant, Ho. 9209, tolled the title, or drew to themselves

[404]*404

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Toni Barrios v. Charlie Simpkins
Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 2022
Donna Babb Frinks v. Patricia Eileen Horvath
Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 2017
Josephine Phelps v. Vern Benke, Jr.
Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 2017
Teresa Vincent v. Jerry S. Johnston, Sr.
Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 2014
Melvin Quarles v. Barbara Atkins Smith
Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 2010
Cumulus Broadcasting, Inc. v. Shim
226 S.W.3d 366 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 2007)
Terrell v. State
361 S.W.2d 489 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1962)
Moore v. Brannan
304 S.W.2d 660 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 1957)
Menefee v. Davidson County
260 S.W.2d 283 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1953)
Robinson v. Harris
260 S.W.2d 404 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 1952)
Moffitt v. Meeks
199 S.W.2d 463 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 1946)
Jones v. Mosley
198 S.W.2d 652 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 1946)
Green v. Greer
198 S.W.2d 822 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 1946)
State Ex Rel. v. Seals
171 S.W.2d 836 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 1942)
Myrick v. Johnson
160 S.W.2d 185 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 1941)
Harrison v. Beaty
137 S.W.2d 946 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 1939)
Reagan v. McBroom
51 S.W.2d 995 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1932)
Patrick v. Goolsby
11 S.W.2d 677 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1928)
Allis v. Hunt
294 S.W. 509 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1927)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
121 Tenn. 400, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kittel-v-steger-tenn-1908.