Kittanning Insurance ex rel. McCain v. Adams

8 Sadler 337
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided October 31, 1887·No. No. 5, W. D.·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The judgment in this case must be affirmed. The case was well tried in the court below; and, notwithstanding the able argument of the learned counsel for the plaintiff in error, we cannot agree to sustain any of the exceptions.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kittanning Insurance ex rel. McCain v. Adams, 8 Sadler 337 (Pa. 1887).

8 Sadler 337 (Kittanning Insurance ex rel. McCain v. Adams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Home Building & Loan Ass'n v. Houlihan
95 A.2d 189 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1953)
Markofski v. Yanks
146 A. 569 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1929)