Kittanning Insurance ex rel. McCain v. Adams
8 Sadler 337
Opinion
The judgment in this case must be affirmed. The case was well tried in the court below; and, notwithstanding the able argument of the learned counsel for the plaintiff in error, we cannot agree to sustain any of the exceptions.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kittanning Insurance ex rel. McCain v. Adams, 8 Sadler 337 (Pa. 1887).
8 Sadler 337 (Kittanning Insurance ex rel. McCain v. Adams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Home Building & Loan Ass'n v. Houlihan
95 A.2d 189 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1953)
Markofski v. Yanks
146 A. 569 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1929)