Kitrel v. State
858 S.W.2d 876, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1292, 1993 WL 309132
Opinion
ORDER
Movant, Michael Kitrel, appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion, without an evidentiary hearing.
The judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous; no error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kitrel v. State, 858 S.W.2d 876, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1292, 1993 WL 309132 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).
858 S.W.2d 876 (Kitrel v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.