Home/Supreme Court of Connecticut/Kitmirides v. Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co.

Kitmirides v. Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co.

786 A.2d 425, 258 Conn. 939, 2001 Conn. LEXIS 488
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedNovember 7, 2001
DocketSC 16615
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 786 A.2d 425 (Kitmirides v. Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kitmirides v. Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co., 786 A.2d 425, 258 Conn. 939, 2001 Conn. LEXIS 488 (Colo. 2001).

Opinion

The plaintiffs’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 65 Conn. App. 729 (AC 21113), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the named plaintiff, listed as a driver of a covered vehicle on the declaration page of the automobile policy issued by the defendant, but not listed as a named insured, was not entitled to underinsured motorist coverage under the policy?”

KATZ, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kitmirides v. Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co.
796 A.2d 1185 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
786 A.2d 425, 258 Conn. 939, 2001 Conn. LEXIS 488, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kitmirides-v-middlesex-mutual-assurance-co-conn-2001.