Kitmirides v. Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Kitmirides v. Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co.

786 A.2d 425, 258 Conn. 939, 2001 Conn. LEXIS 488

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided November 7, 2001·No. SC 16615·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The plaintiffs’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 65 Conn. App. 729 (AC 21113), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the named plaintiff, listed as a driver of a covered vehicle on the declaration page of the automobile policy issued by the defendant, but not listed as a named insured, was not entitled to underinsured motorist coverage under the policy?”

KATZ, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The plaintiffs’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 65 Conn. App. 729 (AC 21113), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the named plaintiff, listed as a driver of a covered vehicle on the declaration page of the automobile policy issued by the defendant, but not listed as a named insured, was not entitled to underinsured motorist coverage under the policy?”

KATZ, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Kitmirides v. Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co., 786 A.2d 425, 258 Conn. 939, 2001 Conn. LEXIS 488 (Colo. 2001).

Pincite

786 A.2d 425 (Kitmirides v. Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related