Kitchens v. Pierce

Ninth Circuit

Kitchens v. Pierce

565 F. App'x 590

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 14, 2014

DocketNo. 10-15737

StatusPublished

This text of 565 F. App'x 590 (Kitchens v. Pierce) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kitchens v. Pierce, 565 F. App'x 590 (9th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

Opinions

ORDER AMENDING MEMORANDUM

The memorandum disposition filed June 14, 2013 is hereby amended. An amended disposition is filed concurrently with this order.

With these amendments, Judge Bea and Judge Restani have voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing. Judge Wallace’s dissent from the denial of panel rehearing is attached hereto. Judge Bea has voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc, and Judge Restani has so recommended. Judge Wallace recommends en banc rehearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER AMENDING MEMORANDUM

The memorandum disposition filed June 14, 2013 is hereby amended. An amended disposition is filed concurrently with this order.

With these amendments, Judge Bea and Judge Restani have voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing. Judge Wallace’s dissent from the denial of panel rehearing is attached hereto. Judge Bea has voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc, and Judge Restani has so recommended. Judge Wallace recommends en banc rehearing.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

565 F. App'x 590, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kitchens-v-pierce-ca9-2014.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack