Kitchen v. State
250 S.W.3d 830, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 598, 2008 WL 1861520
Opinion
Order
George Kitchen appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for ineffective assistance of counsel. Kitchen argues that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to request a mistrial based on juror misconduct. The motion court found that based on the trial attorney’s testimony at the evidentia-ry hearing, the decision not to ask for a *831 mistrial was part of a reasonable trial strategy. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed.
Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kitchen v. State, 250 S.W.3d 830, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 598, 2008 WL 1861520 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).
250 S.W.3d 830 (Kitchen v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Tobin v. Tobin
250 S.W.3d 830 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)