Kitchen v. Rosenfeld

Superior Court of Rhode Island

Kitchen v. Rosenfeld

1 R.I. Dec. 134

CourtSuperior Court of Rhode Island

DecidedMarch 24, 1925

DocketNo. 50312

StatusPublished

This text of 1 R.I. Dec. 134 (Kitchen v. Rosenfeld) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kitchen v. Rosenfeld, 1 R.I. Dec. 134 (R.I. Ct. App. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

SUMNER, J.

Defendant has petitioned for a new trial on the ground that the damages are excessive.

The plaintiff was allowed to testify without objection that the furniture in question was worth $195. The value of the individual items was not brought out on cross-examination. The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff in the sum of $110 and interest, making a total of $135.70. The Court is not satisfied that the amount is excessive.

Defendant’s petition for a new trial is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SUMNER, J.

Defendant has petitioned for a new trial on the ground that the damages are excessive.

The plaintiff was allowed to testify without objection that the furniture in question was worth $195. The value of the individual items was not brought out on cross-examination. The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff in the sum of $110 and interest, making a total of $135.70. The Court is not satisfied that the amount is excessive.

Defendant’s petition for a new trial is denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 R.I. Dec. 134, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kitchen-v-rosenfeld-risuperct-1925.